Citizens

MMA — Pricing Policy & Decision Console

Money Market Account repricing · Deposit Pricing & Analytics

Cohort analysis

Who sits in each decision cohort

Cohort composition on Aug 01, 2026 for working version v4. Geography is available for analysis only — it is deliberately absent from policy logic, so it can be reviewed for concentration without becoming a pricing input.

Accounts in view

8,713

100.0% of the eligible population

Balance in view

$846.46M

of $846.46M eligible

Distinct groups

3

Legacy A/B/C Segment

Weighted APY in view

1.40%

Current rate before any action

Legacy A/B/C Segment × decision cohort

Each row is a population slice; each cohort column shows how that slice was decided. Rows sum across cohorts to the row account count.

Legacy A/B/C SegmentAccountsHouseholdsBalanceAvg balanceAvg APYNo ActionRelationship HoldSmall CutMedium CutLarge CutHold
B3,5583,367$336.88M$94,6831.34%95527%2126%69319%91526%48814%2958%
A2,9242,788$284.69M$97,3641.86%82328%1856%56019%68123%38713%28810%
C2,2312,167$224.88M$100,8000.90%59327%1567%41319%57026%30814%1919%
Total in view8,713$846.46M2,3715531,6662,1661,183774

Concentration review

Slices where a single cohort dominates warrant explanation before approval.

  • No slice of 50 accounts or more is dominated by a single cohort at 60% or above on this dimension.

Reading these numbers

Cohort composition is evidence, not an action.

Concentration in a legacy segment or relationship tier is expected: those attributes correlate with balance and rate sensitivity, which the policy uses directly. Concentration by geography is not expected, because no rule references state. If a geographic slice does concentrate, that is a finding to explain in Execution & Controls before any rate movement is published.

To understand a single account rather than a slice, use Account Trace, which shows the eligibility path, every predicate evaluated and the rule that produced the decision.